‘More likely to trust influencers’—a 2,000-adult survey links trust with purchases

Henry Jollster
more likely trust influencers survey purchases

A September survey of about 2,000 U.S. adults found that one consumer group was more likely to trust influencers and purchase products from them. The result points to a close link between personal credibility and shopping behavior, but key details about the surveyed group were not identified.

The finding matters to consumers, advertisers, and online creators. Influencer promotions often combine personal recommendations with paid marketing. Greater trust may therefore translate into greater sales, especially among audiences that treat creators as reliable sources of advice.

Trust appears tied to buying decisions

The survey’s central finding connects two behaviors. Members of the unnamed group reported greater trust in influencers, and they were also more likely to buy from them.

“This subset was more likely to trust influencers and buy from them.”

That wording suggests an association rather than proof that trust caused a purchase. People who already shop through social platforms may also follow more creators. Frequent exposure could affect both trust and buying habits.

The reported sample of about 2,000 adults offers a broad view of U.S. consumers. However, sample size alone does not establish whether the results represent the entire adult population.

Several research details would help readers judge the finding:

  • How the respondents were selected
  • Which demographic or consumer group formed the subset
  • How “trust” and “buy” were defined
  • Whether purchases were reported or independently verified
  • The survey’s margin of error and sponsor

An unnamed group limits the conclusion

The identity of the subset is central to interpreting the result. Age, income, platform use, shopping frequency, and familiarity with sponsored content could each shape attitudes toward creators.

Without that information, the result should not be applied to a specific generation or social group. It also cannot show how much more likely the respondents were to trust influencers or make purchases.

The timing requires context as well. The research was conducted in September, but no year was provided. Consumer sentiment can change with economic conditions, platform policies, and major shopping periods.

What the finding means for influencer marketing

For brands, the result suggests that creator credibility may support sales. Yet trust can be damaged if advertising relationships are unclear or recommendations appear inconsistent with a creator’s usual content.

For influencers, the survey highlights the commercial value of audience confidence. It also places greater weight on accurate claims and clear disclosure of paid partnerships.

Consumers may benefit from separating a creator’s personal experience from verified product evidence. They can check sponsorship labels, compare independent reviews, and examine return policies before buying.

The September survey offers a useful signal: some adults who trust influencers are also more willing to purchase from them. Still, the missing subgroup, methodology, and effect size prevent a firm conclusion. Further disclosure would show whether the finding reflects a broad consumer shift or the habits of a narrower audience.